Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Mecosta County General Hospital

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 2004No. Docket 122312, 122335, 122338PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

INTRODUCTION

This medical malpractice cáse is before us for the second time. In Roberts v Mecosta Co Gen Hosp, 466 Mich 57; 642 NW2d 663 (2002) (Roberts I), we held that the statute of limitations could not be tolled under MCL 600.5856(d) unless notice was given in compliance with all the provisions of MCL 600.2912b, and that § 2912b imposed no requirement on defendants to object to the sufficiency of plaintiffs notices of intent before the filing of the complaint. Because the Court of Appeals had not addressed the trial court’s conclusion that plaintiffs notices of intent did not comply with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Cox v. Flint Board of Hospital ManagersMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Kenneth Henes Special Projects Procurement, Marketing & Consulting Corp. v. Continental Biomass Industries, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Bush v. ShabahangMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Dalley v. Dykema Gossett PLLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Burton v. Reed City Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Potter v. McLearyMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API