Legal Opinion

Wickens v. Oakwood Healthcare System

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 2001No. Docket 117731PublishedCited by 168 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

The trial court directed a verdict in this medical malpractice case in defendants’ favor on the basis that plaintiff’s claim was barred by MCL 600.2912a(2), which precludes recovery for “loss of an opportunity to survive” unless the “opportunity was greater than 50%. ” We hold that a living person may not recover for loss of an opportunity to survive, and that plaintiff’s claim is therefore barred to the extent that it is based on such loss of opportunity. We further hold that the trial court nevertheless erred in dismissing plaintiff’s case in its entirety, because she has made additional…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Tryc v Michigan Veterans’ FacilityMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. StoneMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Altman v. Meridian TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Sewell v. Southfield Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by168 opinions

  1. Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Allison v. AEW CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLPMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Koontz v. Ameritech Services, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Joseph v. Auto Club Insurance AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 2012

163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API