Legal Opinion
Jersey City v. United States
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 12, 1944No. Civ. A. No. 3073PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.
In this case the plaintiff, City of Jersey City, New Jersey, and the intervener plaintiff, Fred M. Vinson, Economic Stabilization Director, prayed this court to set aside, annul and perpetually enjoin, pursuant to Sections 41(28) and 47 of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 41(28), 47, the rate order issued by Interstate Commerce Commission on June 8, 1943 in a matter titled Investigation and Suspension Docket No. 4394, Passenger Fares of Hudson & Manhattan Railroad Company, 255 I.C.C. 649, and a supplemental order issued therein on November 2, 1943. 256 I.C.C. -. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marine Transport Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1959
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1944