Marine Transport Lines, Inc. v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs have filed a motion for summary judgment in their suit to enjoin or annul an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission made under § 4(1) of the Interstate Commerce Act. 1 Under that section, the Commission may, in special cases, authorize the railways to charge lower rates for long distance hauls than they charge for hauls of shorter distances between intermediate points along the long-haul routes, provided, however, that such lower rates are “reasonably compensatory.” The present order authorizes a lower rate ($9.46 per gross ton) for transportation of sulphur between Texas and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Railroad Commission v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Illinois Commerce Commission v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Richard A. Williams and Alfred S. Trask v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc., Intervenor. Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia, Leonard N. Bebchick and Daniel W. Gottlieb v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc., Intervenor. D.C. Transit System, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968