Legal Opinion
Chisholm v. House
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 26, 1950No. 3996_1PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is a sequel to Chisholm v. House, 10 Cir., 160 F.2d 632, and is related to Bradburn v. McIntosh, 10 Cir., 159 F.2d 925. It involves the correctness of the trial court’s judgment in the proceedings in pursuance of our mandate in the Chisholm appeal.
The factual background and much of the pertinent facts are to be found in the former appeals. In resume, however, the suit was commenced in Í940, in the District Court of Muskogee County, Oklahoma, by the heirs at law of Cussehta Yarhola, a full-blood Creek Indian, alleging a conspiracy on the part of the named…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Oldland v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Purdy v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Alexander v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Greenshields v. Warren Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Blazer v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Manchester Band of Pomo Indians, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1973
- Potash Co. of America v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Smith v. Baptist Foundation of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.