Legal Opinion
Olson v. Coleman
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 22, 1993No. 92-3019PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Carroll Richard Olson filed a pro se complaint against ten defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleged, among other things, that seven of the defendants attempted to falsely arrest him, assaulted and battered him, slandered him, and trespassed upon his property. ■ The remaining three defendants (the county attorney, sheriff, and undersheriff) allegedly failed to prosecute the other seven defendants. In four separate orders the district court dismissed the claims against nine of the defendants for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In re McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anant Kumar Tripati v. William C. BeamanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- In Re SindramSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Braley v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- In Re McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Robert Shawn Treff v. Kerry Galetka, Individually and as the Mailroom Supervisor at the Utah State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- DePineda v. HemphillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Transamerica Premier Ins. Co. v. GrowneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- DePINEDA v. HEMPHILLCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- James Romero v. Guy Peterson and Ivan Rael, in Their Individual CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.