Legal Opinion
Braley v. Campbell
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 9, 1987No. 84-2006PublishedCited by 286 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Rehearing En Banc
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
This en banc rehearing arises from an unpublished order and judgment issued by a panel of this court affirming the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of all defendants in an action brought by plaintiff-appellant Jack A. Braley, D.O. In its order the panel sua sponte labeled the appeal as “patently frivolous, multipli-cious and vexatious,” and invoked the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and Fed.R. App.P. 38 to award costs and reasonable attorney’s fees to appellees, to be paid personally by appellant’s attorney, Robert H. Alexander, Jr.1…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by286 opinions
- Ocelot Oil Corporation v. Sparrow IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Frederick Lawrence White, Jr. Benjamin L. Staponski, Jr., and Gwen G. Caranchini v. General Motors Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States Ex Rel. Jimenez v. Health Net, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Lonsdale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Linda Marie Zambrano, and Jose E. Tafolla, Esq. Philip W. Orr, Esq., Claimants-Appellants v. City of Tustin David KreylingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
281 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.