Legal Opinion
Anant Kumar Tripati v. William C. Beaman
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 7, 1989No. 88-1774PublishedCited by 300 opinions
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Plaintiff Anant Kumar Tripati seeks review of an order of the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming dismissing his action against the clerk of that court, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In his complaint, plaintiff alleged the clerk was not properly processing plaintiff's papers and specifically…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- In Re Billy Roy TylerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Robert Procup v. C. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- In Re McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by300 opinions
- De Long v. HennesseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Andrews v. HeatonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Gladys L. Cok v. Family Court of Rhode IslandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Lonsdale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Robert H. Ketchum v. Salvador Cruz, M.D., Spanish Peaks Mental Health CenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
295 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.