Legal Opinion
In re McDonald
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 21, 1989No. 88-5890PublishedCited by 446 opinions
1Per curiam
Pro se petitioner Jessie McDonald requests that this Court issue a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 2241(a). He also requests that he be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis under this Court’s Rule 46. We deny petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis. He is allowed until March 14, 1989, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 45(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with this Court’s Rule 33. We also direct the Clerk not to accept any further petitions from petitioner for extraordinary writs pursuant to 28 U. S. C. §§ 1651(a), 2241, and 2254(a), unless…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ex Parte FaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Robert Procup v. C. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Sylvester H. Peck v. Cliff Hoff, Deputy Warden, Classification BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Green v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by446 opinions
- Martin v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Melvin P. Deutsch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Miller v. DonaldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Cochran v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- In Re SindramSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
441 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.