Legal Opinion
DePineda v. Hemphill
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 29, 1994No. 94-1094PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*947ORDER
2Per curiam
On July 11, 1994, this court entered an order denying plaintiffs petition for rehearing, 25 F.3d 1056. Upon our own motion, we amend that order as follows.
Upon consideration of plaintiffs petition for rehearing, we conclude that the petition for rehearing is without merit. Accordingly, the petition for rehearing is DENIED.
Based on plaintiffs history of repetitive filings and abuse of the judicial process, we have sua sponte chosen to impose appellate sanctions on plaintiffs future filings in this court “commensurate with our inherent power to enter orders ‘necessary or appropriate’ in…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Anant Kumar Tripati v. William C. BeamanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- In Re SindramSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Robert H. Ketchum v. Salvador Cruz, M.D., Spanish Peaks Mental Health CenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- In Re Rainsford J. Winslow and Winifred W. Winslow, Debtors. Rainsford J. Winslow and Winifred W. Winslow v. C. Gail HunterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by33 opinions
- Nutter v. WefaldDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- DePineda v. PriceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. MilasinovichDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- DePINEDA v. HEMPHILLCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Jaramillo v. FrewingDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.