Legal Opinion
Reiff v. Interim Personnel, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 11, 1995No. Civil 3-94-1564PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Introduction
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ Motion is granted.
Background
Plaintiff Mark Reiff (“Reiff’) was hired as a full-time client services manager in March 1992 by Defendant Interim Personnel, Inc. (“Interim”). Reiff Dep. at 15-16; Complaint ¶ V. 1 Interim Personnel, Inc. (“Interim”) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Interim Services, Inc., and has its corporate headquarters in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, with branch offices in Minneapolis, St. Paul, Brooklyn Park,…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Talavera v. School Board of Palm Beach CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Dovenmuehler v. St. Cloud HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Braziel v. Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- Wilmarth v. City of Santa RosaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1996
- Cline v. Western Horseman, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.