Legal Opinion
Cline v. Western Horseman, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided April 19, 1996No. Civil Action 94-D-1624PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
DANIEL, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court on defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed February 21,1996, wherein defendant argues that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law since plaintiff is not a “qualified individual with a disability” as defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12111(8). Having reviewed the briefs submitted by both parties and considered the pertinent legal authorities, I believe defendant’s motion should be granted for the reasons discussed herein.
II. STANDARDS FOR SUMMARY…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- David L. White v. York International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. KeenanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Matthew SIMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAFELITE GLASS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Rascon v. U S West Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Wilmarth v. City of Santa RosaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1996
- Hindman v. Greenville Hosp. Sys.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1996
- Ellison v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.