Legal Opinion

Llewellyn v. Olson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 10, 1926No. 25,698PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Appeal from the order denying a motion for a new trial after findings awarding plaintiff an agent’s commission in a real estate trade.

The findings of fact were in substance that defendant employed plaintiff to exchange the former’s bungalow for an apartment building; that the exchange was made; that plaintiff was the procuring cause; and that defendant agreed to pay a commission of $250 for the services. And as appellant properly states the real question is whether the evidence supports the finding that plaintiff was the procuring cause of the trade. The finding might well have been that he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. WannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  2. Hubachek v. HazzardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  3. Putnam v. HowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  4. Henninger v. BurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Grose v. KollerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carney v. John Hancock Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. Dahlgren v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Segerstrom v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. State v. StearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. Armstrong v. Brown Bros. Kootz Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API