Carney v. John Hancock Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Suing for a broker’s commission, plaintiff encountered at -the close of his own evidence an adversary motion for directed verdict, which was granted. He appeals from the order denying him a new trial.
Then the owner of a line of automobile filling stations in Minnesota, defendant in the autumn of 1929 transferred the whole property to Phillips Petroleum Company, taking in exchange stock in the latter corporation. We assume the transaction to have been so far a sale that, if not otherwise barred, plaintiff was entitled to a commission. He avers his employment by one Dixon representing…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Whitcomb v. BaconMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Armstrong v. WannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Hubachek v. HazzardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Ward v. FletcherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Baars v. HylandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Schimmelpfennig v. GaedkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Dobson v. WolffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
- Neumeier v. SperzelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- David Kend v. Chroma-Glo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Mehlberg v. RedlinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.