Legal Opinion

State v. Stearns

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 13, 1931No. 28,634PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Convicted of the crime of tittering a forged instrument, defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for new trial.

The instrument in question is a Crow Wing county “auditor’s warrant” bearing date of June 8,1929, for $30, payable to the “order of Ray Carner.” Itself genuine and properly issued, the forgery alleged was that of blank indorsement by the payee. The warrant was one of a series issued to Carner for work done under defendant as a “maintenance man” on a county highway. Subject to the approval of the county engineer, defendant was authorized to employ help as needed. Men so…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National German-American Bank v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  2. State v. RixonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Llewellyn v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. State v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  5. State v. WoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HigginSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API