Segerstrom v. Webb
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
This is an action to recover of defendants $23,775 as commission for bringing about the sale or merger of three abstract companies and a title insurance company of Minneapolis. When the parties rested the court directed a verdict for the defendants. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered pursuant to the directed verdict.
The trial court was of the opinion that there ivas evidence of a contract between the plaintiff and the defendants upon which plaintiff was entitled to go to the jury; but it held as a matter of law that the evidence fell short of proof that the plaintiff was the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Armstrong v. WannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Hubachek v. HazzardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Smith v. PreissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Putnam v. HowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Esterly-Hoppin Co. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dahlgren v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Gunderson v. North American Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Silverglade v. DeanDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1949