Legal Opinion

Segerstrom v. Webb

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 19, 1932No. 28,670PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

This is an action to recover of defendants $23,775 as commission for bringing about the sale or merger of three abstract companies and a title insurance company of Minneapolis. When the parties rested the court directed a verdict for the defendants. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered pursuant to the directed verdict.

The trial court was of the opinion that there ivas evidence of a contract between the plaintiff and the defendants upon which plaintiff was entitled to go to the jury; but it held as a matter of law that the evidence fell short of proof that the plaintiff was the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. WannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  2. Hubachek v. HazzardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  3. Smith v. PreissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. Putnam v. HowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  5. Esterly-Hoppin Co. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dahlgren v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Gunderson v. North American Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. Silverglade v. DeanDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API