Pinto v. Seely
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. Thomas F. Graham, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
The plaintiff in this action, as the administratrix of the estate of Julian Pinto, deceased, recovered a judgment against the defendant in the sum of $1,950 for services alleged to have been rendered to the defendant by Pinto as an attorney at law. The case comes here upon the judgment-roll and a bill of exceptions in support of appeals from the judgment and from an order denying the defendant a new trial.
“Irregularity in the proceedings . . . and an abuse of discretion by which the defendant was prevented from having a fair trial” were among the grounds of the defendant’s motion for a new…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. RolfeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- People v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Sanders v. SeelyeIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Skinner v. HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Hitchings v. . Van BruntNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Loeb v. KimmerleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Preston v. HerminghausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Boardman v. ChristinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- In the Matter of James J. Laughlin and Albert J. Ahern, Jr., Attorneys for Guardian of the Estate of Thomas Charles Ball, InfantCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Provident Land Corp. v. BartlettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.