Legal Opinion

Boardman v. Christin

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 23, 1924No. Civ. No. 4131PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is an action 'by an attorney at law to recover compensation for services alleged to have been rendered by him under a contract with the defendant Estelle C. Christin, whose husband, C. A. Christin, is made a party defendant solely because, as the law stood when the action was commenced, the husband was required to be joined with the wife. Judgment passed for plaintiff and defendants appeal. The grounds of the appeal are that Mrs. Christin’s promise to pay plaintiff is not supported by any consideration, and that plaintiff failed to perform the obligation of his contract.

The facts in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Corson v. LewisNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Baird v. RatcliffTexas Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Pinto v. SeelyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  4. Moore v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Neblett v. GettyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Norman v. BerneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Preston v. HerminghausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Hooker v. American Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API