Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 13, 1992No. 2 CA-SA 92-0020PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LACAGNINA, Presiding Judge.

The real party in interest was charged in a misdemeanor complaint in February 1991 with one count of operating as a contractor without a license in violation of A.R.S. § 32-1151, and one count of advertising as a contractor without a license in violation of A.R.S. § 32-1165. Following the denial of his motion for a jury trial in justice court, the real party in interest filed a special action in superior court. The respondent judge granted the motion for a jury trial, the ruling giving rise to this special action. Because the state is without an adequate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Muniz v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. O'NEILL v. MangumArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State Ex Rel. Dean v. DolnyArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. RicheyArizona Supreme Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wei Cong Mei v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Rodriguez-Castro v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  3. State Ex Rel. McDougall v. StrohsonArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Benitez v. DunevantArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API