O'NEILL v. Mangum
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Vice Chief Justice;
Petitioner-defendants, James L. and Elsa R. O’Neill, husband and wife hereinafter referred to as defendants, each stand charged in the City Court of the City of Phoenix with a violation of A.R.S. § 13-379, 1 Drunk and disorderly, a misdemeanor. At their arraignment on September 8, 1967 the defendants entered a plea of not guilty and demanded trial by jury. Following denial of their demand for jury trial and exhaustion of their remedies in the superior court and court of appeals, defendants filed in this court an original petition for an alternative writ of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Cheff v. SchnackenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Callan v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- District of Columbia v. ClawansSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Derendal v. GriffithArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Goldman v. KautzArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. BennionIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- State Ex Rel. McDougall v. StrohsonArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Baumert v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.