Legal Opinion

State v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 22, 1997No. 1 CA-SA 97-0156PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANKFORD, Judge.

The State petitions this Court for special action relief, claiming that the trial court erred in granting defendant’s request for a jury trial. We agree and grant the State’s requested relief.

Because the State is without an adequate remedy by appeal, and special action review is the proper manner to address the right to a jury trial, we accept jurisdiction. See State v. Miller, 172 Ariz. 294, 295, 836 P.2d 1004,1005 (App.1992).

The facts are as follows. Defendant was charged with contracting without a license, a class one misdemeanor. See Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. (“A.R.S.”) §…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State Ex Rel. Baumert v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. Mungarro v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. QuintanaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  2. Amancio v. ForsterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. Benitez v. DunevantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. Benitez v. DunevantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. State v. FlournoyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API