Legal Opinion
Benitez v. Dunevant
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 2000No. CV-98-0540-PRPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JONES, Vice Chief Justice:
Facts and Procedural History
¶ 1 Daniel Paul Benitez was charged, inter alia, with violating Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (A.R.S.) section 28-3473(B) (1998)1 — driving a motor vehicle on a license suspended for an earlier DUI violation. He was tried in Phoenix City Court without a jury and found guilty of the violation, a class one misdemeanor. Pursuant to relevant sentencing statutes, the maximum sentence available was six months’ incarceration, see A.R.S. § 13-707(A)(1) (1989), and a fine of $2500, see A.R.S. § 13-802(A) (1989). Additionally, under…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Blanton v. City of North Las VegasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Goldman v. KautzArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- O'NEILL v. MangumArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Bruce v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Marmolejo-Campos v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Wei Cong Mei v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Derendal v. GriffithArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Tornabene v. Bonine Ex Rel. Arizona Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Urs v. Maricopa County Attorney's OfficeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.