Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Strohson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1997No. CV-97-0118-SAPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOELLER, Justice.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Respondent Dale W. Cantrell was charged in Phoenix Municipal Court with simple assault, a class 1 misdemeanor, in violation of A.R.S. § 13-1203(A)(1). The victim of the alleged assault was the sixteen-year-old son of respondent’s girlfriend. In accordance with Arizona’s domestic violence statutes, A.R.S. §§ 13-3601 and 13-3602, the complaint designated the offense to be “domestic *121violence,” a designation that is unchallenged in this proceeding.

Respondent requested a jury trial. In doing so, he acknowledged that, under established Arizona law,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. ClawansSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Blanton v. City of North Las VegasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Town of Chino Valley v. City of PrescottArizona Supreme Court · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. RingArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. Derendal v. GriffithArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Myers v. ReebCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. Benitez v. DunevantArizona Supreme Court · 2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API