Tierco Maryland, Inc. v. Williams
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
HARRELL, Judge.
It should surprise no one that a fundamental jurisprudential principle is that irrelevant considerations may not be a proper basis for a jury’s verdict. In this civil action asserting theories of recovery based solely on assault, battery, false imprisonment, and negligent supervision, as submitted to the jury, the Respondents/Plaintiffs repeatedly raised at trial, through argument and testimony, insinuations of racial discrimination by at least some of the corporate defendant’s alleged employees. Because the record demonstrates a significant probability that the jury’s award to…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- MacK v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Caldor, Inc. v. BowdenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Molesworth v. BrandonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Darcars Motors of Silver Spring, Inc. v. BorzymCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- City of Bowie v. MIE, Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Cooley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Alexis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Bienkowski v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Taylor v. MandelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.