Legal Opinion

Tierco Maryland, Inc. v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 14, 2004No. 65, Sept. Term, 2003PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRELL, Judge.

It should surprise no one that a fundamental jurisprudential principle is that irrelevant considerations may not be a proper basis for a jury’s verdict. In this civil action asserting theories of recovery based solely on assault, battery, false imprisonment, and negligent supervision, as submitted to the jury, the Respondents/Plaintiffs repeatedly raised at trial, through argument and testimony, insinuations of racial discrimination by at least some of the corporate defendant’s alleged employees. Because the record demonstrates a significant probability that the jury’s award to…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. MacK v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Caldor, Inc. v. BowdenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Molesworth v. BrandonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. Darcars Motors of Silver Spring, Inc. v. BorzymCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. City of Bowie v. MIE, Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Cooley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Alexis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  4. Bienkowski v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Taylor v. MandelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API