Legal Opinion

MacK v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 23, 1984No. 40, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 152 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The primary question presented in this case is whether under Maryland Rule 4-325(c) a trial court in a criminal case must, if requested by the accused, instruct a jury that an accused cannot be found guilty of use of a handgun in the commission of a crime of violence under Maryland Code (1957, 1982 Repl.Vol., 1983 Cum.Supp.), Art. 27, § 36B(d) if found not guilty of a crime of violence as defined in Maryland Code (1957, 1982 Repl.Vol., 1983 Cum.Supp.), Art. 27, § 441(e).

Maryland Rule 4-325(c) 1 provides in pertinent part:

“The court may, and at the request of any party shall,…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. Giles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Stevenson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. Poole v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by152 opinions

  1. Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Grandison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Merzbacher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Hook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989

147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API