Bienkowski v. Brooks
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtEldridge, J.
Article IV, § 22, of the Maryland Constitution grants, with some exceptions, a right of appeal from a decision by a circuit court to a three-judge “court in banc.” 1 The court “in banc is established and functions ‘as a separate appellate tribunal,’ ” and the “purpose of the constitutional provision authorizing an in banc appeal was to provide a substitute or alternate for an appeal to the Court of Appeals,” Board v. Haberlin, 320 Md. 399, 406, 578 A.2d 215, 218-219 (1990). “The decision of the court en banc is conclusive, final and nonappealable by the party who sought the en banc review....…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Welsh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lee v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Kushell v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Davis v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Shell Oil Co. v. Supervisor of AssessmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Hill v. Cross Country Settlement, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Harvey v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Mayor of Baltimore v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Debbas v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.