Legal Opinion

Bienkowski v. Brooks

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 11, 2005No. 34, September Term, 2003PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEldridge, J.

Article IV, § 22, of the Maryland Constitution grants, with some exceptions, a right of appeal from a decision by a circuit court to a three-judge “court in banc.” 1 The court “in banc is established and functions ‘as a separate appellate tribunal,’ ” and the “purpose of the constitutional provision authorizing an in banc appeal was to provide a substitute or alternate for an appeal to the Court of Appeals,” Board v. Haberlin, 320 Md. 399, 406, 578 A.2d 215, 218-219 (1990). “The decision of the court en banc is conclusive, final and nonappealable by the party who sought the en banc review....…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Welsh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Lee v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Kushell v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Davis v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. Shell Oil Co. v. Supervisor of AssessmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Hill v. Cross Country Settlement, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Harvey v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Debbas v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API