Legal Opinion
Denesha v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided July 28, 1997No. 95-0122-CV-W-BDPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAYS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Following a nine day jury trial, plaintiffs claims pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 626, et seq., and the Missouri Human Rights Act, Chapter 213 R.S.Mo. (MHRA), were submitted to the jury through a series of questions pro pounded by Verdict Forms A, B and C. On June 20, 1996, the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff Denesha finding that age was a determining factor in defendant Farmers Insurance Exchange’s decision to not give plaintiff a salary increase in December 1992 and that the conduct was willful.…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gerling v. WaiteDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022
- Robinson v. City of St. Louis, MissouriDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
- Roswick v. Mid Dakota Clinic, P.C.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2019
- Sanders v. BNSF Railway Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
- Sellers v. PetersDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2008