Legal Opinion

Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Criswell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 17, 1985No. 83-1545PublishedCited by 235 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

The petitioner, Western Air Lines, Inc., requires that its flight engineers retire at age 60. Although the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29 U. S. C. §§621-634, generally prohibits mandatory retirement before age 70, the Act provides an exception “where age is a bona fide occupational qualification [BFOQ] reasonably necessary to the normal operation of the particular business.” A jury concluded that Western’s mandatory retirement rule did not qualify as a BFOQ even though it purportedly was adopted for safety reasons. The question here is whether the jury was properly…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by235 opinions

  1. Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kimel v. Florida Board of RegentsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Aktieselskabet Af 21. November 2001 v. Fame Jeans Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  4. Smith v. City of JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

230 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API