Legal Opinion
Dutcher v. Randall Foods
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided April 17, 1996No. 94-1530PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERNUS, Justice.
Appellant, Lori Duteher, successfully proved her employer, appellee Randall Foods, violated the Equal Pay Act 1 , see 29 U.S.C. § 206(d) (1992), and the Iowa Civil Rights Act, see Iowa Code ch. 216 (1993). A jury awarded Duteher lost wages and benefits. The trial court, however, refused to award Duteher liquidated damages, damages for emotional distress and attorney fees. Duteher appealed. We reverse the trial court’s denial of liquidated damages and attorney fees, and remand for determination of an appropriate fee and entry of judgment in accordance with our decision.
I.…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Hyler v. GarnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Molo Oil Co. v. River City Ford Truck Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- Schefke v. Reliable Collection Agency, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Friolo v. FrankelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Erin Dindinger v. Allsteel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.