Legal Opinion

Dickson & Campbell, L.L.C. v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 2009No. 90519PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mary J. Boyle, Judge.

{¶ 1} Appellant, Dickson & Campbell, L.L.C. appeals a judgment of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas affirming an administrative decision by the Cleveland Municipal Court’s Parking Violations Bureau, Photo Safety Division, finding Dickson & Campbell liable for two speeding violations. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.

{¶ 2} In early 2007, Dickson & Campbell received two notices of liability for speeding violations pursuant to Cleveland Codified Ordinances (“CCO”) 413.031. The notices provided that on January 19, 2007, and January 22, 2007, a vehicle…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kisil v. City of SanduskyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Lorain City School District Board of Education v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Henley v. City of Youngstown Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Provident Bank v. WoodOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. S.R.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lycan v. Cleveland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. McCarthy v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  3. Lycan v. ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Lycan v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Lycan v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API