Legal Opinion
McCarthy v. City of Cleveland
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 9, 2010No. 09-4149PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAMUEL H. MAYS, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiffs Daniel McCarthy and Colleen Carroll appeal the judgment of the district court dismissing their action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs allege that the City of Cleveland’s decision to enforce its traffic camera ordinance against drivers who lease their cars constituted an unconstitutional taking of private property without just compensation because the ordinance originally did not provide for lessee liability. The district court disagreed and dismissed their suit after concluding that their Amended Complaint failed to state a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Weigel v. MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- L.L. Nelson Enterprises, Inc. v. County of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Lyle Heyward v. Heather CooperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Lyndsey Ballinger v. City of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.