Lycan v. Cleveland (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.
{¶ 1} This interlocutory appeal arises in a class action challenging the city of Cleveland’s collection of fines for traffic violations captured by its automated cameras. Defendant-appellant, the city of Cleveland, appeals the decision of the Eighth District Court of Appeals, which affirmed the trial court’s class-certification order and the appointment of plaintiffs-appellees, Janine Lycan, Thomas Pavlish, Jeanne Task, Lindsey Charna, Ken Fogle, and John T. Murphy, as named plaintiffs. Because Cleveland has raised no arguments regarding class certification here, we affirm the Eighth…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. SchwartzwaldOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Grava v. Parkman Twp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Lycan v. ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- Cool v. FrenchkoOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Paulus v. Beck Energy Corp., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh District, Monroe County2017
- Lycan v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Cantlin v. Smythe Cramer Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.