Legal Opinion

Kisil v. City of Sandusky

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1984No. 83-1449PublishedCited by 379 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford F. Brown, J.

I

The parcel of land located at 508 Huron Avenue, Sandusky, Ohio, is a single-family residence which was erected before the 1956 enactment of the Sandusky city zoning ordinances. The area in which the property is situated was designated R2F by the 1956 ordinance. R2F zoning allows two-family dwellings and single-family dwellings. When plaintiff-appellant purchased the property in question in 1981, he did so for investment purposes with the idea of renting the residence. Appellant testified before the commission and board that he desired to convert the residence from a single-family to a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. University of Cincinnati v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Dudukovich v. Lorain Metropolitan Housing AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Consolidated Management, Inc. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Cincinnati Bell, Inc. v. Village of GlendaleOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Farrand v. State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by379 opinions

  1. Henley v. City of Youngstown Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Cleveland Clinic Found. v. Cleveland Bd. of Zoning Appeals (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Independence v. Office of the Cuyahoga Cty. Executive (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Henley v. Youngstown Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Smith v. Granville Township Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1998

374 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API