Legal Opinion

Avery v. Baird

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 6, 1920No. 22,560PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Decatur district court; Celsus A. P. Falconer, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one by a real-estate agent to recover a commission for the sale of a tract of land. The plaintiff recovered, and the defendants appeal.

The plaintiff pleaded that he sent the defendants the following telegram: “Think I can close deal on McKenzie quarter $3,100 cash net to you. Wire answer.” The defendants replied as follows: “Will sell McKenzie quarter thirty-one hundred cash net to us.” Pursuant to these telegrams, the plaintiff negotiated a sale of the land for $3,400, which the defendants received. The defendants refused to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Deter v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Jeffries v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. Krhut v. PharesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. Ratliffe v. CeaseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Langston v. HoytSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  2. Schlesener v. MottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. Bradrick v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Doty v. MorrowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Jones v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API