Legal Opinion

Bradrick v. Woodward

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1938No. 33,988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*785The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, C. J.:

This was an action to recover a sum of money which came into the hands of defendant in the course of an exchange of certain Wichita city properties negotiated by him as agent of plaintiff.

Plaintiff’s petition narrated the material facts. Defendant demurred on two grounds: (1) no cause of action stated, and (2) the statute of limitations.

The demurrer was overruled, and defendant answered with a general denial, a plea which gave his version of the transaction out of which this controversy has arisen, and again raising the statute of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Atchison Grain Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Deter v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Guernsey v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  4. Krhut v. PharesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Avery v. BairdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bessman v. BessmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Hey, Recr. v. CummerOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Gates v. Kansas Farmers' Union Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API