Legal Opinion

Schlesener v. Mott

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 5, 1920No. 22,513PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Dickinson district court; Roswell L. King, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*42The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

L. A. Sehlesener brought this action to recover damages resulting from the false representations and fraud of his agents, W. H. Mott and J. R. Kohler, in the sale, purchase and exchange of parcels of real estate. Plaintiff recovered damages in the amount of $3,504.22, and from the judgment defendants appeal.

It appears that plaintiff owned a tract of land in Texas upon which a value of $8,000 was placed. It was subject to an encumbrance of $3,812, which included four vendor’s lien notes of $373.75 each, previously executed by plaintiff.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jeffries v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  2. Avery v. BairdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. Kershaw v. SchaferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Rinebarger v. WeesnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Ratliffe v. CeaseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Merchant v. ForemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Rood v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  3. Doty v. MorrowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  4. Graber v. TennantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  5. Kansas Wheat Growers Ass'n v. WindhorstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API