Legal Opinion

Krhut v. Phares

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 3, 1909No. 16,017; No. 16,115PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from Trego district court; Jacob C. Ruppenthal, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

In the district court the Krhuts were plaintiffs and Phares was defendant. The plaintiffs alleged they were the equitable owners of a tract of land which they listed for sale with the defendant, a real-estate agent, at a given price, agreeing to pay a percentage of the price as a commission, in consideration whereof the defendant undertook to -find a purchaser. The defendant found a purchaser at the stated price, but fraudulently represented he had a purchaser at a smaller sum, which was all he could obtain. The plaintiffs were induced to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Provident Loan Trust Co. v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Jeffries v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bessman v. BessmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Steward v. SirrineArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Crawford v. Surety Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Hampe v. SageSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  5. Robertson v. TalleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API