Legal Opinion
Enfield Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Bissell
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 7, 1981PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
This case is a backwash of this court’s decision in Society for Savings v. Chestnut Estates, Inc., 176 Conn. 563, 576-77, 409 A.2d 1020 (1979), which held unconstitutional the statutory procedures governing the assessment of deficiency judgments after mortgage foreclosures. In response to Society for Savings, the legislature amended General Statutes § 49-14 to provide for a hearing consistent with the requirements of procedural due process. For transition purposes, §49-14 (d) provided further that “[a]ny appeal pending in the supreme court with regard to any deficiency judgment or proceedings…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Fusari v. SteinbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Diffenderfer v. Central Baptist Church of Miami, Florida, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Inhabitants of Goshen v. Inhabitants of StoningtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1822
- Society for Savings v. Chestnut Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- American Masons' Supply Co. v. F. W. Brown Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Moore v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Darak v. DarakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. BlaskoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Capalbo v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Gionfriddo v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.