Fusari v. Steinberg

This case comes to us on appeal from a three-judge District Court determination that the Connecticut “seated interview” procedures for assessing continuing *380eligibility for unemployment compensation benefits violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 364 F. Supp. 922 (Conn. 1973). Our independent examination of Connecticut law reveals that the State significantly revised its unemployment compensation system following the District Court’s decision. Some of the amendments are designed to ameliorate problems that the court identified. In these circumstances, we think it…