Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hinckley v. Capital Motor Transportation Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 2, 1947PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

This is an action of tort brought on behalf of a minor, Roy B. Hinckley. The declaration as originally drawn contained a count for personal injuries and a count for property damage. By amendment a third count was added in which Daniel W. Hinckley, the father of Roy, sought consequential damages. See G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 231, § 6A, as inserted by St. 1939, c. 372, § 1. The counts for personal injuries and property damage were submitted to the jury, and verdicts for the plaintiff were returned. The judge directed a verdict for the defendant on the count for consequential damages. The case comes…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Guinan v. Famous Players-Lasky Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Wallace v. LudwigMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Thibeault v. PooleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Brazinskos v. A. S. Fawcett, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  5. Holden v. BloomMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thornton v. First National Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  2. Zarba v. LaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  3. Charles L. Hazelton & Son, Inc. v. TeelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  4. Phillips v. LarsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  5. Mendes v. CostaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API