Legal Opinion
Holden v. Bloom
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 30, 1943PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDolan, J.
This is an action of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff, a minor, as a result of alleged negligence on the part of the defendant. The case was tried first in the District Court together with an action of the minor’s father for consequential damages. At the close of the evidence the defendant made two requests for rulings as follows: “1. As a matter of law there is no evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant which contributed to the plaintiff’s injury. 2. There is sufficient evidence as a matter of law to warrant the court in finding that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Baggs v. HirschfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Thibeault v. PooleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Wilson v. GraceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Bessey v. SalemmeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Lynch v. KrancerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Goldstein v. GontarzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Falzone v. BurgoyneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Arrigo v. LindquistMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Clouatre v. LeesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Hinckley v. Capital Motor Transportation Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.