Mendes v. Costa
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
The question for decision in these two actions of tort is whether the judge erred in directing verdicts for the defendant. One of the actions is brought by Ida *609Mendes, a minor (hereinafter called the plaintiff), to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. The other action, brought by the plaintiff’s father, is for consequential damages.
The evidence most favorable to the plaintiff is this. On the afternoon of July 26, 1941, the plaintiff attended a wedding reception which was held at a club on Prairie Avenue, Attleboro. The defendant was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thibeault v. PooleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Theriault v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Baines v. CollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Hinckley v. Capital Motor Transportation Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cavanaugh v. First National Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Pilotte v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Bouvier v. BouvierMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1956
- Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. PerezMassachusetts Superior Court · 2013
- Pilotte v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1981