People v. MacY
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBubnett, J.
The action was brought under the “Red-light Abatement Act” [Stats. 1913, p. 20], for the purpose of abating a nuisance existing in the Johnson House, a hotel in Chico, and of causing the same to be closed as provided by the provisions of said act. The judgment was in favor of the plaintiff, from which the owner of the premises has appealed. Three points are made by appellant, as follows:
1. He insists that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the judgment, for the reason that it consists solely of evidence of the general reputation of said house in the community.
2. It is claimed that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- White v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. LiphardtMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Judge v. KribsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- People v. HanselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Demartini v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Board of Supervisors v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. LanzitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- People Ex Rel. Hicks v. Sarong GalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- People v. GoodardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- People v. FrankovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.