Legal Opinion
Cook v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 21, 1988No. 54314PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARD, Judge.
Movant appeals after the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
Movant was convicted of first-degree robbery and armed criminal action and was sentenced to consecutive prison terms of 35 and five years. On direct appeal we affirmed the robbery conviction and reversed the conviction of armed criminal action. State v. Cook, 606 S.W.2d 241 (Mo.App.1980).
On July 24, 1987, movant filed a pro se Rule 27.26 motion, alleging his trial counsel was ineffective because he failed 1) to adequately interview or prepare two alibi witnesses, 2) to file a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Thomas v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Seltzer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Aerotronics, Inc. v. Pneumo Abex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Morgan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Thomas v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Brown v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. DayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.