Legal Opinion
Aerotronics, Inc. v. Pneumo Abex Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 9, 1995No. 94-3430PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
Pneumo Abex Corporation appeals from a final judgment entered by the district court 1 upon a jury verdict in favor of Aerotronics, Inc. For reversal, Pneumo argues that the district court: (1) violated the parol evidence rule; (2) erred in its instructions to the jury; (3) improperly applied Missouri’s ten-year statute of limitations; and (4) erred in refusing to grant Pneumo’s motion for judgment as a matter of law. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Pneumo Abex Corporation (Pneumo) and its subsidiaries design "and manufacture components for commercial and military aircraft. As a…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Shifrin v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- Goodwin, Inc v. Orson E Coe Pontiac, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Vivian Sprynczynatyk and Paul Sprynczynatyk, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Dr. Gopal Potti, Kamala Potti, Vinayak Potti, a Minor, and Lakshmi Potti, a Minor, Cross-Appellants v. Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Eastern Trading Company v. Refco, Inc., and Refco Capital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Harry E. Horstmyer Eveline M. Horstmyer v. Black & Decker, (u.s.), Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Grain Land Coop v. Kar Kim Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Lovett v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Golden TriangleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.