Legal Opinion
Thomas v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 28, 1987No. 52541PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARD, Judge.
Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
Movant was convicted by a jury of second degree burglary and stealing and sentenced by the court as a persistent offender to consecutive terms of imprisonment of ten years on the burglary conviction and five years on the stealing conviction. His convictions were affirmed by us in State v. Thomas, 684 S.W.2d 569 (Mo.App.1984).
Movant filed a pro se Rule 27.26 motion seeking to set aside his convictions and sentences. He alleged that the original complaint charging him with burglary was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Allen v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rice v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- Chapman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. CobbAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Short v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. HuttonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Childress v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Chatman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Mathenia v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.