Legal Opinion

Seltzer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1985No. 49196PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

This appeal is from the trial court’s judgment denying movant’s motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 27.26. Movant was convicted by a jury of first degree assault. § 565-.050 RSMo 1978. He was sentenced to twenty-five years imprisonment to run concurrent with a previous sentence. We affirmed the conviction on direct appeal. State v. Seltzer, 655 S.W.2d 75 (Mo.App.1983). We affirm.

In this civil proceeding our scope of review is limited to a determination of whether findings, conclusions and judgment of the trial court as they appear in the record are clearly erroneous.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Seales v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  2. Jones v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. State v. TashMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Sherrill v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. State v. CainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. HamiltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Short v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Guyton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Young v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Malone v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API