Legal Opinion

Richardson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 1986No. 51140PublishedCited by 215 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Judge.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant was convicted by a jury of first degree murder and was sentenced to life imprisonment, His conviction was affirmed on direct appeal by this court in State v. Richardson, 674 S.W.2d 161 (Mo.App.1984).

Movant filed a pro se motion to vacate his sentence under Rule 27.26. After he retained counsel, movant’s first amended petition was filed, and an evidentiary hearing was held. In denying the motion, the court issued findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Movant’s sole point on appeal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Seales v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. Pool v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Gentile v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Smith v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by215 opinions

  1. Clemmons v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  2. Armour v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  4. State v. HendersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989

210 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API