Legal Opinion

Watts v. Crocker-Citizens National Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 3, 1982No. Civ. 46906PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LEVINS, J. *

Donald and Mary Dale (Dale), and R. Robert Watts (Watts), appeal 1 from an order dismissing their respective cross-complaints against Crocker-Citizens National Bank (Crocker) on grounds of the four-year statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., § 337). For the reasons set forth below, we have concluded that the order must be reversed.

The pertinent underlying facts are not in dispute and were stipulated below as follows: In 1949, Crocker acquired all of the property here in dispute under a trust created by Minardi, the owners of the original un divided interest. As trustee,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Vai v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Gribaldo, Jacobs, Jones & Associates v. Agrippina Versicherunges A. G.California Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lantzy v. Centex HomesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Paccar International, Inc. v. Commercial Bank of Kuwait, S.A.K.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Valley Circle Estates v. VTN Consolidated, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Parsons v. TicknerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API