Watts v. Crocker-Citizens National Bank
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LEVINS, J. *
Donald and Mary Dale (Dale), and R. Robert Watts (Watts), appeal 1 from an order dismissing their respective cross-complaints against Crocker-Citizens National Bank (Crocker) on grounds of the four-year statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., § 337). For the reasons set forth below, we have concluded that the order must be reversed.
The pertinent underlying facts are not in dispute and were stipulated below as follows: In 1949, Crocker acquired all of the property here in dispute under a trust created by Minardi, the owners of the original un divided interest. As trustee,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Vai v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Gribaldo, Jacobs, Jones & Associates v. Agrippina Versicherunges A. G.California Supreme Court · 1970
- People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lantzy v. Centex HomesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Paccar International, Inc. v. Commercial Bank of Kuwait, S.A.K.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Valley Circle Estates v. VTN Consolidated, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Parsons v. TicknerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.