Legal Opinion
Parsons v. Tickner
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 2, 1995No. B074550PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (C. S.), J.
Introduction
Appellant Polly Parsons appeals from the judgments of dismissal entered upon orders sustaining without leave to amend the general demurrer of respondents Edward Tickner, James Dickson, Edward Tickner, and James Dickson doing business as Tickner Dickson Music, Len Freedman, and Len Freedman doing business as Len Freeman Music (hereafter collectively referred to as the Tickner respondents) to her first amended complaint and the general demurrer of respondent Gretchen L. Parsons to her second amended complaint. We reverse because we find appellant has…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Carman v. AlvordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Vai v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Kachig v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Platt Electrical Supply, Inc. v. Eoff Electrical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Kline v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Mez Industries, Inc. v. Pacific National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Baxter v. Cal. State Teachers' Ret. Sys., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.